Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > ATTN Yo Yo OC 64 3500+

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

ATTN Yo Yo OC 64 3500+

Reply to Message Icon

Name: houston1981
Date: February 17, 2005 at 16:28:40 Pacific
OS: XP Pro
CPU/Ram: P4 2.66 HT / 1024 MB 333
Comment:

For starters thanks for all the advice from everyone. Now onto the OC, this should help you mate Yo Yo.

After having no luck raising the FSB with any kind of multiplier and posting here, i started again.

I set the HT to x4 and was able to get to:

10 x 225 (without changing the ram speed)

at 230 the ram gave out so i dropped ot to 166 and raised the FSB to:

10 x 230 (RAM speed 191.6 according to CDP-Z)

I'm still in the middle of OC'ing but i thought id post the preliminary results here to see if it would help out.

Good luck

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: houston1981
Date: February 17, 2005 at 17:27:30 Pacific
Reply:

Ok after a bit of fidling, ive come up with two different end results and i need some info on which is better:

Result 1

RAM = 166MHz (actual 208 i think)
FSB = 245
Multi = 10
HTT = x4

Actual Speed = ~2450 MHz

Result 2
RAM 166 (209.7)
FSB = 255
Multi = 9
HTT = x4

Actual speed = `2300 MHz

So which would be better? I know the second has a lower final speed, but the FSB is higher....

Also im not sure of the reason for stopping at this point, the temp never went above 47c and i played with different voltage setting's but i can't seem to push past this point. Even with the HT and RAM speed lowere more then this it still won't go higher.

Would this just be the limit of my particular CPU?

heh heh long post but one more:

Is 3rd party cooling really necessary if my temps are still not much above stock?

Well im off to play a little more and see what i come up with.


Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Response Number 2
Name: YOYO
Date: February 17, 2005 at 18:33:29 Pacific
Reply:

Houston,

I obviously don't know much about 64's. As a matter of fact, I don't know a whole lot about anything. But I do know this. Jam would pick the higher FSB over the GHZ any day. He claims that that is where the performance is and up to this to this point in time, I believe him. I can honestly say that he has never steered me wrong. Go for the FSB. And that's my opinion and I'm stick'n to it! Good luck! And if you don't mind, I would like to pass this info on to my friend. Thanks for the input!

YO


0

Response Number 3
Name: YOYO
Date: February 17, 2005 at 18:48:15 Pacific
Reply:

But Houston,

I'm confused by your ram settings. 166? Do you mean 166X2=333mhz as in 2700DDR? Don't you have 3200DDR which is 200X2=400mhz? Maybe I misread something. Hmmm!!!

YO


0

Response Number 4
Name: YOYO
Date: February 17, 2005 at 18:52:22 Pacific
Reply:

Hey Houston,

And are you in Australia or New Zealand?

Just curious.

YO


0

Response Number 5
Name: houston1981
Date: February 17, 2005 at 18:55:16 Pacific
Reply:

Yeah i set it to 166, but with the 45Mhz overclock the memory actually runs at 209Mhz, as reported by CPUz, i got that tip from a couple of posts on here.

As to the benefits of FSB vs GHz ill do some benchmarking right now (as there's not much else to do and post some results up.

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: houston1981
Date: February 17, 2005 at 19:13:08 Pacific
Reply:

Ok after some quick benchmarks (this is by no means a comprehensive test).
Using PCMark 2004 Pro and only the 10 system tests.


10 x 246 = 4708

9 x 255 = 4534

Hmm interesting,... anyone want to comment?

My temps finally hit above 50c i think 57c under load, should i be worried?

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Response Number 7
Name: houston1981
Date: February 17, 2005 at 19:17:04 Pacific
Reply:

ha ha forgot to answer your other question,

Campbelltown, Australia about an hour from Sydney for those non-NSW's people.

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Response Number 8
Name: houston1981
Date: February 17, 2005 at 19:28:35 Pacific
Reply:

Heh a lot of posts for two blokes eh? :)

I just set everything back to standard and got ~4300 PCMarks. Not really much of a jump considering that the biggest OC was over 2000 MHz. Wonder if thats because the HTT was lowered?

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Response Number 9
Name: YOYO
Date: February 17, 2005 at 19:31:11 Pacific
Reply:

LOL! I know a dude from New Zealand. A big time rugby player he was, and I remember that he always sounded like Crocadile Dunde! Of course the Crock was from Australia. lol!
Nice to meet you mate! How is my Texas accent? lol! I really like that kind'a talk!

Now back to the problem. Well! I would haf to to go with the top numbers in your case mate!

If you learn anything more, pass it along.

As I said before, Thanks for the info!

YO


0

Response Number 10
Name: Rob115
Date: February 18, 2005 at 05:02:39 Pacific
Reply:

YOYO lower your HT down to 3 and try to raise your fsb higher you may have to lower your ram down to 133


0

Response Number 11
Name: Rob115
Date: February 18, 2005 at 05:03:49 Pacific
Reply:

I mean Houston sorry


0

Response Number 12
Name: jam
Date: February 18, 2005 at 11:44:23 Pacific
Reply:

I'm not up on the Athlon 64 & what settings work best.

For a socket A system, I would recommend shooting for the highest possible stable FSB setting, even if that means running the CPU slighty slower overall. But you also have to remember that the RAM's throughput should be in balance with the CPU's bandwidth, or the RAM will bottleneck the system. I assume this holds true with the A64.

I don't know if either of these will help or not:

http://www.hothardware.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=23&threadid=24884&enterthread=y

http://www.amdzone.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=50541

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8 x 210MHz
512MB PC3200
Asus Ti4200 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Response Number 13
Name: YOYO
Date: February 18, 2005 at 16:39:04 Pacific
Reply:

Jam, Thanks!

YO


0

Response Number 14
Name: houston1981
Date: February 18, 2005 at 20:38:45 Pacific
Reply:

Ha Ha you would never believe it i just come back from getting stitched up because a beer exploded while i was mowing the lawn and shot me in the arm!!!! The worst part is this is the second time ive been shot by a beer bottle!! (used to work in the tooheys brewery at lidcombe)

I know its off topic but i need someone to cry to and besides, im drunk and that excuses all bad behaviour!!!!

BTW YoYo did your mate have any luck with his 3400 yet? and if so how high did he get it?

and Jam thanks for those pages, after a bit of looking, it seems that 10x245 is around the highest anyone really goes barring different RAM and HT settings.

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Response Number 15
Name: YOYO
Date: February 19, 2005 at 02:39:18 Pacific
Reply:

Houston,

Nah. I think he finally made it back to stock and gave up. I would hate to think I spent $2200 on a puter that I couldn't fiddle around with. BTW what's the going beer in Australia now?

YO


0

Response Number 16
Name: Rob115
Date: February 19, 2005 at 05:34:39 Pacific
Reply:

was it an empty can the exploded? I am a landscaper and when I cut the big open lawn with my rider lawn mower I migh run over 5 cans usally they make a loud noise and puff there gone.


0

Response Number 17
Name: houston1981
Date: February 19, 2005 at 05:49:10 Pacific
Reply:

oh man, always Toohey's NEW for any self respecting Aussie, and ROB, no it was a couple of bottles of home brew that had been sitting on the back porch in the sun for about 6 months, i think a rock from the trimmer hit one and it went of like a FRAG grenade.

Fished some glass out of my arm a glued it back up, been out on the burboun all night.

But working at the brewery it was a regular occurence, cause they're pastuerised (heated to kill the bacterier, to improve shelf life) a couple of dozen would explode every day, i just seem to be the one with the target painted on him!!!!! The best thing to see was cans exploding on the production line, it 's like dominoes.

But just a note on the OC'ing, i stopped at 10x245 FSB, RAM at 166 (204.2MHz OC) and HT at x4, this is with the standard cooling and im happy with that, and with my shiny new X800 XT platinum i doubt that any new software will be giving me lip any time soon.

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 @ 2450
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Response Number 18
Name: Rob115
Date: February 19, 2005 at 13:04:51 Pacific
Reply:

X800 XT platinum man wish I had that!!!!!!!!!


0

Response Number 19
Name: houston1981
Date: February 19, 2005 at 14:14:10 Pacific
Reply:

Heh heh yeah im good :)

Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
Athlon 64 3500+
Dual -
Corsair TwinX CMX512-3200XL
Gecube X800 XT Platinum
Seagate 200 Gig
Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

AMD64 3400+ running at 80... upgrading cpu



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: ATTN Yo Yo OC 64 3500+

OC Athln 64 3500+ 939 www.computing.net/answers/cpus/oc-athln-64-3500-939/11241.html

AMD 64 3500 - Venice or Clawhammer? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-64-3500-venice-or-clawhammer/12027.html

Athlon 64 3500+ and RAM www.computing.net/answers/cpus/athlon-64-3500-and-ram/10965.html