Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > AMD's Atom rival offered in $430 no

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

AMD's Atom rival offered in $430 no

Reply to Message Icon

Name: freebirds
Date: November 2, 2008 at 19:31:51 Pacific
OS: xp
CPU/Ram: intel/2gb
Product: Dell
Comment:

AMD does not have a dedicated chip that would be able to aim at all the market segments addressed by Intel's Atom processor. Offering an aging entry-level processor to compete in the "Ultra-Value-Client" market is really just a half-baked solution for AMD to ride the low-end PC wave right now, but even if AMD isn't pumping out enough processors to match Intel's Atom volume, the company was successful in placing the products at the very bottom of the market.

news source...



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jam
Date: November 3, 2008 at 05:23:53 Pacific
Reply:

Your point is ???

"If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions" - Jules Winnfield (Samuel L. Jackson) in Pulp Fiction


0

Response Number 2
Name: freebirds
Date: November 3, 2008 at 16:17:08 Pacific
Reply:

AMD needs to be in the game to keep the competition, so that better chips come at affordable prices from both Intel & AMD. Dropping off the radar isn't going to be good for anybody..


0

Response Number 3
Name: Cobra_R
Date: November 4, 2008 at 11:39:05 Pacific
Reply:

Who's says they are dropping off the market? Many people thought the same thing about intel in 2004-2005 when their chips didn't stack up to AMD's and AMD was out performing them in price and performance. AMD will be fine. They are getting things back in gear. Now that they sold their fab plants they no longer have to worry about making chips and designing processors at the same time. They can now just focus on designing processors and having 3rd party companies like the Foundry Company make their chips. This will not only save AMD a lot of money in the long run, but allow AMD to focus more on future projects due to the money that they are saving by not having to construct their own chips anymore. It was either that or AMD go completely under and no one wants a chip market that's completely ruled by Intel again or else budget intel chips would end up costing as much as current mainstream chips and mainstream chips will end up costing as much as highend chips again.

If it's broke, then blow that sucka up!


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: AMD's Atom rival offered in $430 no

AMD Splits in Two www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-splits-in-two/14921.html

What happened to AMD's K9 CPU's? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/what-happened-to-amds-k9-cpus/14093.html

Intel or AMD 64? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/intel-or-amd-64/11765.html