Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Amd processor faster in games

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Amd processor faster in games

Reply to Message Icon

Name: giles
Date: April 20, 2006 at 00:27:41 Pacific
OS: WIN XP
CPU/Ram: 2.8/1GB DDR
Product: INTEL/PENTIUM
Comment:

What technology amd are using? why they are good in games?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Sabertooth
Date: April 20, 2006 at 07:37:09 Pacific
Reply:

All other components considered. Some of the things that give AMD the edge include.

0. Lower CPU power requirement.

1. Lower heat dissipation (cooler).

2. Higher computation numbers per cycle.

3. Intergrated memory controller.

4. Friendly to overclocking.

5. Usually cheaper to build.

Since you are most likely looking at a K8 upgrade, you should go over its architecture as well.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Cobra_R
Date: April 20, 2006 at 16:24:17 Pacific
Reply:

"3. Intergrated memory controller."

That's the key reason why.

Intel doesn't have an intergrated memory controller. The frontside bus connects the CPU to the main memory in a system.

AMD's integrated memory controller is on the chip which reduces system latency, or the amount of time it takes for data to move from one component to another.

So in other words Intels memory controller is slower because it has to go outof the processor to the FSB and back again. AMD's memory controller doesn't do that since it's intergrated into the chip.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2GB Dual Channel DDR 3200
Nvidia 7800GT
SATA II 2x 200gig 7200rpm 16mb cache RAID-0
Gigabyte Nforce 4 SLI



0

Response Number 3
Name: Cobra_R
Date: April 20, 2006 at 16:44:28 Pacific
Reply:

One more thing to note why Intel has stayed away from intergrated memory controllers for this long.

Anyone remember Intels Timna processor? You prob dont, because it was never launched. It was suppose to launch back in mid 2001 and it did feature an integrated memory controller, but it was locked into Rambus' RDRAM (Rambus dynamic RAM) memory technology, which was too expensive for most users. The chip never saw the light of day, partly because RDRAM never entered the mainstream and partly because Timna's chip set was delayed due to several manufacturing flaws.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2GB Dual Channel DDR 3200
Nvidia 7800GT
SATA II 2x 200gig 7200rpm 16mb cache RAID-0
Gigabyte Nforce 4 SLI



0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Amd processor faster in games

LAPTOP (AMD vs INTEL) for games.... www.computing.net/answers/cpus/laptop-amd-vs-intel-for-games/11829.html

AMD processor core's www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-processor-cores/13382.html

New computer running slowly in game www.computing.net/answers/cpus/new-computer-running-slowly-in-game/10612.html