Specialty Forums
Security and Virus
General Hardware
CPUs/Overclocking
Networking
Digital Photo/Video
Office Software
PC Gaming
Console Gaming
Programming
Database
Web Development
Digital Home

General Forums
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 95/98
Windows Me
Windows NT
Windows 2000
Win Server 2008
Win Server 2003
Windows 3.1
Linux
PDAs
BeOS
Novell Netware
OpenVMS
Solaris
Disk Op. System
Unix
Mac
OS/2

Drivers
Driver Scan
Driver Forum

Software
Automatic Updates

BIOS Updates

My Computing.Net

Solution Center

Free IT eBook

Howtos

Site Search

Message Find

RSS Feeds

Install Guides

Data Recovery

About

Home
Reply to Message Icon Go to Main Page Icon

AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket

Original Message
Name: hcky11kev
Date: January 1, 2007 at 17:31:51 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
OS: XP Home
CPU/Ram: Athlon 64 3200+
Model/Manufacturer: eMachines T6212
Comment:
I recently ordered an OEM AMD 64 4000+ 939 cpu from newegg.com. My current cpu is a 64 3200+ which came with my eMachines. Would it be wise to upgrade the cpu fan or should the stock fan be fine? Thanks

Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0GHz 2000MHz FSB
1024 Dual Channel PC3200
XFX GeForce 6600GT PCI-E


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: Cobra_R
Date: January 1, 2007 at 17:48:02 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
Reply: (edit)
Stock fan should be fine. If you look at a pc company like e-machines they pretty much use the same fans and heatsinks for motherboards that support numrous types of processors in that series. Unless you overclock you don't need anything to really cool down the s939 AMD Athlon 64 processor, because it runs pretty cool already as is.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ OC 2.7ghz
2GB Dual Channel DDR 3200
Nvidia 7900GT
SATA II 2x 300gig 7200rpm 16mb cache RAID-0+1
Gigabyte Nforce 4 SLI



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Sabertooth
Date: January 2, 2007 at 10:32:09 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
Reply: (edit)
I don't know about you, but I would not have gone with another single core upgrade, especially not from an A64 3200+ (S939).

You should have asked before making that purchase.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: jam
Date: January 2, 2007 at 13:44:56 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
Reply: (edit)
http://www.heatsinkoutlet.com/


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: hcky11kev
Date: January 2, 2007 at 19:38:48 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
Reply: (edit)
I don't really need a multi-core processor right now. Just wanted a quick cheap upgrade for the time being. Not many X2 AMDs for 939s anyway.

Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0GHz 2000MHz FSB
1024 Dual Channel PC3200
XFX GeForce 6600GT PCI-E


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: Sabertooth
Date: January 2, 2007 at 21:55:22 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
Reply: (edit)
And I totally understand that. However, my point was, the money you spent on the 4000+ would have more justification if it was put towards a faster video card or even more memory.

See the sweet spot.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: Zac3200
Date: January 14, 2007 at 06:43:46 Pacific
Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket
Reply: (edit)
I recently got an AMD Athlon 64 4000 939 for my pc that had a 3200. I looked everywhere for an X2. I ended up ordering several X2s but all of them were out of stock. Damn AMD, 939 was supposed to be the one for all the new processors. Wankers. My PC is:

AMD Athlon 64 4000 939
2048MB DDR400 RAM
Asus PCIx 16 7600GT 600Mhz 256MB
WD 160 SATA2 HHD
Asus N force 4 Ultra motherboard


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal



Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: AMD 64 4000+ 939 Socket

Comments:

 
  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 


Data Recovery Software




DSHUB24 Connection Problems

need help with dsl and dial up

novel 3.12

help mandriva install last straw!

Icon Scaling in Explorer Bar


The information on Computing.Net is the opinions of its users. Such opinions may not be accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. Computing.Net cannot verify the validity of the statements made on this site. Computing.Net and Computing.Net, LLC hereby disclaim all responsibility and liability for the content of Computing.Net and its accuracy.
PLEASE READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER AND LEGAL TERMS BY CLICKING HERE

All content ©1996-2007 Computing.Net, LLC