Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > 2500+ DDR400 and MSI K7N2GL

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

2500+ DDR400 and MSI K7N2GL

Reply to Message Icon

Name: cdubfromcali
Date: January 3, 2006 at 19:21:31 Pacific
OS: XP home
CPU/Ram: barton 2500/DDR400
Comment:

i have had this system for over 3 yrs now and just bought a gig of 3200 to overclock the 2500 a wee bit more than i could with 2700. did as people said set clock@11 set fsb@200 raised vcore to 1.7. ran good for 1 day then started rebooting and causing my hard drive to act up(kept clicking and wouldnt boot)-(stopped doing this after i put in my old 2700) anyone else have the same mobo as me and runs this chip still have any suggestions



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Sabertooth
Date: January 3, 2006 at 21:15:40 Pacific
Reply:

What brand of ram ?

BTW, are you able to ramp up the Vcore a tad more to 1.75v ?

Try that and see if that helps.

I agree; computing.net does need an edit button.


0

Response Number 2
Name: cdubfromcali
Date: January 3, 2006 at 23:11:02 Pacific
Reply:

ya it goes all the way up to 1.8 but i read that most can run 200fsb at stock vcore settings(1.6-1.7) . just wondering how many people out there still run oc'd 2500's and what their settings and system's are. my mobo says it only handles 333fsb cpu's but it can use ddr400. doesnt realy make sense. i have the latest bios also.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Sabertooth
Date: January 4, 2006 at 09:28:05 Pacific
Reply:

"ya it goes all the way up to 1.8 but i read that most can run 200fsb at stock vcore settings(1.6-1.7) . just wondering how many people out there still run oc'd 2500's and what their settings and system's are".

No two systems overclock the same, even when completely identical in configuration. Did you raise the Vcore yet ?


"my mobo says it only handles 333fsb cpu's but it can use ddr400. doesnt realy make sense."

This is not unusual and am not sure why it doesn't make sense to you, for example I owned the 2500+ a while back. It was paired with the NF7-S revision v2.0 (ABIT), it had all of the features of the prior revision v1.2 but the Barton 400 MHz FSB support was added.

The CPU is faster than RAM memory and usually it has to wait for the RAM memory to deliver data...see the link below

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/133

I agree; computing.net does need an edit button.


0

Response Number 4
Name: cdubfromcali
Date: January 4, 2006 at 18:04:03 Pacific
Reply:

ok i ran the vcore at 1.7 only and that was it, once it started mesing with my hd i backed off and put my 333 back in till i can read up on stuff a bit more.i have a cheap 350 watt psu and was thinking maybe that was the case. i have a dual dvd burner setup (2 dvd burners) an ati 9600XT a pci capture card a 160 gig hd(wd) and a pci ethernet card.I also replaced my stock barton heatsink and fan with a TT volcano 9+ but its on the lowest fan setting. so maybe thats a bit too much for that lil 350 and thats what made my hd start acting up.... i dunno . im gonna pick up a 450 psu this weekend and try the ddr400 some more.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More


computer is weird help Video Card Stress Program



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: 2500+ DDR400 and MSI K7N2GL

Overclock Barton 2500+ failure, and www.computing.net/answers/cpus/overclock-barton-2500-failure-and/10750.html

xp 2500+ choices and unlocking www.computing.net/answers/cpus/xp-2500-choices-and-unlocking/9189.html

AMD barton 2500+ 333 fsb www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-barton-2500-333-fsb/12043.html