Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > 1x512 MB or 2x256 MB DDR

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

1x512 MB or 2x256 MB DDR

Reply to Message Icon

Name: birdie800
Date: August 6, 2003 at 10:46:48 Pacific
OS: win
CPU/Ram: xp 1700-Tbred B/DDR 333
Comment:

Which set up would be better for performance, 1 stick of 512 or 2 sticks of 256? I've seen a lot of memory kits sold at higher prices when they're 2 sticks of 256 rather than 1 module of 512, even though they're the same exact memory. Does it have something to do with the dual channel controllers nforce 2 boards have now? Or is there even a big difference between the two set ups? I'm getting an Abit NF7-S rev 2.0 and I wanted to choose the best memory set up before I bought the memory. What do you guys think?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Gian2oo1
Date: August 6, 2003 at 11:53:44 Pacific
Reply:

I don't know if either would have better "preformance", but I would get the one stick of 512 so If I wanted to upgrade in the future, I would have more slots avail. on my motherboard. BestBuy has 512 266 DDR for $35 right now :) I picked up two.

- G


0

Response Number 2
Name: directedition
Date: August 6, 2003 at 12:38:57 Pacific
Reply:

I'd go with 2x256 chips. Your ram won't have to put everything through a single DDR bank to access data. This is even more so with nVidia's dual channel DDR, which would nearly double the performance of your ram.


0

Response Number 3
Name: TMP-Man
Date: August 6, 2003 at 12:46:48 Pacific
Reply:

I would choose 1x512MB personally. You will have more slots to upgrade more memory in the future. If you are not planning to upgrade, you can use 2x256, they are usually cheaper. If you have a Dual Channel DDR Motherboard, 2x256 will be your best choice. Otherwise, just grab 1 stick of 512.


0

Response Number 4
Name: John
Date: August 6, 2003 at 17:50:55 Pacific
Reply:

I would go with 2X256 sticks matched set. that is probably why they are more expensive but they are definately worth it for the dual channel mem. i am not sure if that motherboard supports dual channel.. if it does get dual channel which requires 2 sticks of same. i.e 2X256..


0

Response Number 5
Name: Steam
Date: August 6, 2003 at 23:52:11 Pacific
Reply:

A vote for 2Xxxx...

Seems like the new MB is going to be a dual-channel one. So go for 2X256.

I just think you should go for 2X512 As win 2000 and win XP can use 1024 with high efficency.

Just buy marked memory like corsair or crucial. 333MHz or 400MHz is a good choise. CL2 or CL2,5. 512 Should be around 80-110€. Its more or less the same in US$.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Tony
Date: August 8, 2003 at 12:30:18 Pacific
Reply:

well if your mobo supports dual channel then go for the 2X256, if it doesn't then your not going to see much of an improvement in performace than just 1X512. those kits are made specificly for the dual channel mobo and are better for that use than normal ram, but most don't support dual channel, so check out your mobo specs, hope this helps


0

Response Number 7
Name: birdie800
Date: August 9, 2003 at 11:06:25 Pacific
Reply:

I do believe the Abit NF7-S does have a dual memory controller.

http://www.essencompu.com/nupplysingar.asp?ID=2922

Do the memory sticks have to be the same exact memory? Or will 2 different sticks do the same job?


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Id like to get started ov... FSB settings?



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: 1x512 MB or 2x256 MB DDR

333Mhz Vs 400Mhz DDR??? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/333mhz-vs-400mhz-ddr/6403.html

400 mhz fsb on 333 mhz ddr www.computing.net/answers/cpus/400-mhz-fsb-on-333-mhz-ddr-/8552.html

DDR vs. SDRAM www.computing.net/answers/cpus/ddr-vs-sdram/2199.html