Specialty Forums
Security and Virus
General Hardware
CPUs/Overclocking
Networking
Digital Photo/Video
Office Software
PC Gaming
Console Gaming
Programming
Database
Web Development
Digital Home

General Forums
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 95/98
Windows Me
Windows NT
Windows 2000
Win Server 2008
Win Server 2003
Windows 3.1
Linux
PDAs
BeOS
Novell Netware
OpenVMS
Solaris
Disk Op. System
Unix
Mac
OS/2

Drivers
Driver Scan
Driver Forum

Software
Automatic Updates

BIOS Updates

My Computing.Net

Solution Center

Free IT eBook

Howtos

Site Search

Message Find

RSS Feeds

Install Guides

Data Recovery

About

Home
Reply to Message Icon Go to Main Page Icon

Re:PowerPC and BeOS Performance

Original Message
Name: fmh
Date: February 7, 2004 at 06:57:47 Pacific
Subject: Re:PowerPC and BeOS Performance
OS: BeOS
CPU/Ram: 2-180mhz 604 + 208 Meg RA
Comment:
This is in repsonse to this older message which I can not post a direct reply to : http://miataru.computing.net/beos/wwwboard/forum/1055.html


I have a Mac 9500MP a dual 180mhz PPC with 208 Meg of RAM. Performance is good but nowhere near the performance of a Pentium. I never ran BeOS with an old Mac upgraded to a G3 or G4 CPU. I know you can do it but I never upgraded a CPU on any of my Macs.

Like the previous posting stated there are far fewer applications on the PPC side than on the X86. Your biggest loss is in the Web Browsers. Under PPC you only have Net+ and that's it, no Mozilla, Firebird, or Opera. Even if you did many of the older Macs (603 or 604) out there would probably not be able to handle it CPU wise.

I also run BeOS on a Mac 8500-120 with 64 Meg RAM and a Mac 4400-200 with 48 Meg of RAM. Only the 9500MP with dual CPUs shows any signs of life as far as performance goes. I know the extra RAM helps but you are dealing with very old hardware with slow system buses. The 9500MP has a 45mhz bus while the 8500 and 4400 have a 40mhz bus. Plus depending on the CPU some 603s and 604s have little to no L1 or L2 cache. Compound that with slower SCSI, RAM Speed and built in non accelorated graphics cards of the 8500 and 4400 things are not too pretty. It's just old hardware plain and simple.

I also run BeOS R5.03 on my Sony Vaio J-150 a 800mhz AMD Duron with 384 Meg of RAM and there is just no comparison in speed between the 9500MP and the Sony. The Sony just plain smokes the Mac.

Don't get me wrong I love my 9500MP and run OS 9.22, OSX 10.1.3, BeOS R5.03, OSX Server 1.1 (aka Rhapsody 5.5) and Win98 via an Orange Micro card under OS9.22. Though this machine is no longer my main machine it still does get some use. BeOS on an old Mac adds more use/life to the system.


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: dominicus
Date: February 8, 2004 at 10:31:23 Pacific
Subject: Re:PowerPC and BeOS Performance
Reply: (edit)
Interesting post..as it happens i was thinking about BeOS on my 4400/200, as it's now on my older pentium, and seems a bit challenged (just a P1, a fast one, but a P1 nonetheless).
Because, in my case , the mac just smokes the P1, i was thinking it might be worth it..mind you, it was a challenged mac till i maxed out the RAM (try finding ram for those models!), gave it a much faster harddrive, and upgraded the cache..these things help enormously with the mac OS, but how much they'll help with BeOS i'm not sure.....

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: memsom
Date: February 14, 2004 at 17:29:54 Pacific
Subject: Re:PowerPC and BeOS Performance
Reply: (edit)
No offence, but I have a PM9500MP 180, 136MB RAM and numerous SCSI hardisks both internal and external. R5.03 runs as good for me as my P3 800 used to, and smokes my old P1 200mmx. What you are saying is almost laughable. I can run MacOS under Sheepshaver an see performance as good as MacOS alone on this machine. It sounds like something you have attached to your machine is killing performance or that your machine has some other issues. Have you tried running Pulse whilst doing other things and looking at CPU load?

Which graphics card are you using? The ATi Mack64 that came with my 9500 was horrible. I use a ISM TwinTurbo 128 now, fully natively supported with acceleration.

I also question the speed of the drive you installed on and the size of the partition you used.

I own a BeBox too, 66MHz model. It is still fast enough under R5 to do stuff on.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal




Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Re:PowerPC and BeOS Performance

Comments:

 
  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 


Data Recovery Software




DSHUB24 Connection Problems

need help with dsl and dial up

novel 3.12

help mandriva install last straw!

Icon Scaling in Explorer Bar


The information on Computing.Net is the opinions of its users. Such opinions may not be accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. Computing.Net cannot verify the validity of the statements made on this site. Computing.Net and Computing.Net, LLC hereby disclaim all responsibility and liability for the content of Computing.Net and its accuracy.
PLEASE READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER AND LEGAL TERMS BY CLICKING HERE

All content ©1996-2007 Computing.Net, LLC