Computing.Net > Forums > BeOS > quake II- software vs hardware accl

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

quake II- software vs hardware accl

Reply to Message Icon

Name: mrx
Date: October 10, 2004 at 22:53:00 Pacific
OS: BeOS max v3
CPU/Ram: 400/300
Comment:

hi, its mr X again.
the big question is, is what i think. i only think this, because i do not know. but you, who does know, is going to answer the question.

quake II is the most 'advanced game' for beos right? sadly, it probly is.
i was reading some bench marks, with systems running windoze . well, my current system stacks up as this:
p-II 400
128x3 pc-100 ram
443lx chipset
seanix columbia III motherboard.
3dfx 16mb card.

i run quake II at 800x600.
and this is the frame rate i get in quake II: about 14 .bleh. i typed 'timerefresh' in the console and let it do its thing. i know the difference between hardware accell and software accel, like with the dvd player example.

-> why dont they put 500mhz cpu in a set-top dvd player. because the most efficient way of palying the dvd is hard-coded into the cpu. like the eeprom chips, when you burn the software code into it, it runs alot faster. but with a pc dvd player, the instuctions are in the software, and then the cpu has to decode it. but if the software was emulated as the hardware, the speed would go faster. like with set-top dvd players.
now, with a video card, it is like the same parady with the set-top dvd player, the most efficient way of getting better fps are coded into its hardware, but we need the software, to tell the gpu to do most of the processing, and the software, like gl or direct x or drivers, make it happen.
this should be pretty much true. no?

back to my point.

i noticed that when you go into the quake II video options, choose driver, and you choose hardware or software. well, hardware would go alot faster, but i doesnt work. it just crashes. only software works. i searched bebits for gl, direct x and no results that i could download. i also once installed the beos forbidden beta's with the gl kit. but it screwed up so bad that no 3d games would run. period.
so does this mean, i have no hope of a hardware accel for beos quake II? or can some smart(er) guy on beos help me here. i could put in a 500mhz p-III , but its in the garage, and im mad at the cpu cooler to put it back in.
dont think im a windbag for just an over winded write-up.
this site
http://www.roce.org/articles/hwacceleration.html
the hardware accel part was used.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: dominicus
Date: October 10, 2004 at 23:03:50 Pacific
Reply:

CPU's not really the issue..it's the video card..some are better than others for HW accelleration


0
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More






Use following form to reply to current message:

Login or Register to Reply
LoginRegister


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: quake II- software vs hardware accl

HELP!! need driver of U.S robotics 56K www.computing.net/answers/beos/help-need-driver-of-us-robotics-56k-/613.html

Is BeOS dead ? www.computing.net/answers/beos/is-beos-dead-/1010.html

External Drive not mounting www.computing.net/answers/beos/external-drive-not-mounting/1285.html