Computing.Net > Forums > BeOS > Beos vs WinXP

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Beos vs WinXP

Reply to Message Icon

Name: alvin loh
Date: August 23, 2004 at 23:04:31 Pacific
OS: WinXP
CPU/Ram: 128Ram
Comment:

i am doing a assigment ..about BeOS vs WindowsXP..
Can anyone give me some information ~!
just tell me what you thing about.No need Website THK
give me the information of advantages and disadvantages of both OS

....thank


__________________
(",)



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: matjako
Date: August 24, 2004 at 01:21:14 Pacific
Reply:

my pros, note xp has some of the features, but I jut find them done more "the right way" on BeOS:
+ low hardware requirements
+ short boot-up time
+ fast, low latency scheduling/multi-threading
+ very responsive, slick gui with multiple desktops (workspaces)
+ no-nonsense configuration and app settings (uses fs, not registry)
+ very decent PnP yet without any kind of "install device dialogs". If you have a driver it will work , no questions asked
+ simple de/installing of drivers and add-ons, just copy/delete
+ it is possible to put all drivers to user folders instead system folders (they override system ones, but they can also be disabled at boot time)
+ uses MIME types for identifying apps and file types
+ when doing "open with" in Tracker possible app candidates are ranked according to their usfulness and are automatically removed when app is removed, no need for deinstall procedure, also you can move app manually and open with will work
+ DataType translators for system wide data conversion
+ uses BFS file system, a 64bit, journaling file system with attributes and database-style indexing and queries.
+ can mount FAT32, ext2 and NTFS file systems.
native FS - BFS, with
+ elegant SDK (so called Kits) no arcane Win32 weirdness.
+ a pure-breed desktop, personal OS, no compromises

cons:

- few apps
- few drivers, bad hardware support for new machines
- not multiuser (although technically there are m-u capabilities built in)
- there are two *incompatible* versions of networking layer, only Userland NetServer is officialy released, but is not as efficient as Kernelland BONE version.
- a pure-breed desktop, personal OS, no compromises ;)


Matt


0

Response Number 2
Name: Bobthearch
Date: August 26, 2004 at 07:14:31 Pacific
Reply:

A report written from first-hand experience would be more 'real'. Why don't you download and install BeOS? Then you can develop your own list of pros and cons.

Best Luck,
Bob


0

Response Number 3
Name: alvin loh
Date: September 1, 2004 at 20:59:59 Pacific
Reply:

thank for ur guy information


0

Response Number 4
Name: ModeenF
Date: October 5, 2004 at 09:58:47 Pacific
Reply:

Here's som info
http://haiku-os.org/develop.php
(making a os that are binary compatible with BeOS)
the best to topics in that link are
Programming the Be Operating System (PDF)
Practical File System Design (PDF)


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More






Use following form to reply to current message:

Login or Register to Reply
LoginRegister


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Beos vs WinXP

No USB www.computing.net/answers/beos/no-usb/603.html

How can I boot in to BEOS ? www.computing.net/answers/beos/how-can-i-boot-in-to-beos-/774.html

BeOS & XP & XP www.computing.net/answers/beos/beos-amp-xp-amp-xp/422.html